Evaluation of Socrates' Argument that he is Not Afraid of Death

According to Platos Apology, philosopher Socrates was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death in 399 for his teachings to the youth and community of capital of Greece on topics such(prenominal) as virtue, religion, and the illegitimate smell in ones testify wisdom. Even as Socrates fought, some(prenominal) as a head word and as an involved citizen of the community of Athens, to uphold and teach what he believed to be morality and virtue, his critics sought to silence his public talks. Socrates, twain throughout his life, as well as throughout his trial, remained sanitary in his conviction that a loss of dishonor or the possibility of disgrace was farthermost worse than death. However, firearm Socrates duologue during his trial was at least partially aimed at proving to those critics that he was non afraid of death, his arguments failed, primarily due to the flunk of those arguments. This prow word will focus on those faults, and will level that, while on that poin t may have been no serviceman wiser than Socrates, as stated by the Pythian prophetess, his arguments against his fear of death were far from wise. In the end, even his own convictions could not convince the masses, or early readers, of a strong argument against the fear of death. The inaugural weakness of Socrates argument is actually presented within the context of his bill of the marge wise.

As Socrates explains, when asked who was wiser than Socrates, the god of Delphi, through the Pythian oracle, stated that there was no man wiser. Socrates, not able to believe such a claim, sought to prove the god incorr ect by seek those wiser than he. He sought! to find refutation against this claim, showing his belief that the oracle could be wrong. Yet later, when discussing his reasoning for not fearing death, he mentions that the... If you indispensableness to get a full essay, mold it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper