A Working Community – Ellen Goodman

Goodman quotes from her dictionary that geographically a community is defined as a soundbox of good deal who run low in unity adorn and that in the last(prenominal) we were members of precincts or parishes or school districts.Perhaps if tribe in the other(prenominal) were asked what a community was to them, this would be the definition they would give. Over the years however, people curb been increasingly spending more time in their place of employment kind of than in their home.Goodman points out that in todays societies many of us only use the community in which we live our home in order to sleep. Communities are becoming more a group of people who get to know each other and act regularly. They gather around a concept or common final stage or interest. Rather than belong to a community in which we live, we increasingly create a genius of belonging in the workplace inwardly the community in which we find ourselves most of the time.2. Goodman also points out that n on only has our sense of community moved from division house to office building but that the labels we wear connect us with the members and that we assume we perk up more or lessthing in common with them. In modern order of magnitude this notion of grant labels to oneself and others is becoming more evident.People do this because they want to feel a sense of belonging, a sense that they have things in common with others. A line not mentioned in Goodmans article however, is that not only do we assign labels in the workplace, but we tend to describe most people by assigning labels. These labels most often contain assumptions, which in distort become stereotypes3. According to Goodman, in the same way that we have replaced our neighborhoods with the workplace, we have replaced our ethnic identity with professional identity.She goes on to state that the most evident realignment of community is in the mobile professions. In todays society many professionals are required to move from city to city in order to fulfill their work. They are able to put roots bring in their profession rather than in their place of residence (residential community). This intensifies the prisonbreak from home communities to workplace communities and the sense of identifying oneself in damage of profession rather than self.4. Goodman begins her article by providing a few scenarios of people she knows and how they belong to distinct communities. Most readers would be able to associate with somebody or some community, so by doing this she is setting the scene for her readers she is appealing to their sense of belonging from the onset and involving them emotionally from the beginning.In fact, she continues to do this throughout the article, especially by apply the first person plural pronoun we. She does however, attempt to rationally appeal to her readers by presenting many scenarios and examples to support her arguments but she provides no real facts or figures in support.Her ex amples need to be extended to give real examples rather than continually referring to issues in general terms. She makes reference to researchers asking Americans what they like best approximately work but again only in general terms she doesnt provide any real evidence of what Americans say.Ethically, she appears to be wise(p) and reasonable and she certainly tries to establish common ground with her readers but she travel short in not providing any consideration of opposing views.5. Bi-cultural bang as discussed by Nhu in Becoming American in a Constant Cultural Collision is similar to a loss of community, in that they both refer to a movement of people a realignment from one sense of belonging to another.