The Germ Theory Of Disease

The Germ guess Of DiseaseThe germ supposition of disease is a theory that suggests that altogether types of specific pathogenic diseases are ca utilize by micro-organisms called germs. This theory was developed by Louis Pasteur through the reserve out of Antoine Bechamp.Observation and questioning stage1854 Pasteur, the 19th century biologist and chemist, suffers the film director of scientific studies where he had studied.1857 He begins his work on the theory of germs and micro-organisms. His depression research based on Fermentation in intoxicant, much(prenominal) as wine and beer.Through his research, he found that fermentation without oxygen, involved animate organisms that abound in the surface of all objects in the air and in water.1861 Pasteurs germ theory is published.Hypothesis and experiment stage1864 He used the process of pasteurisation to heat liquid such as, milk and alcohol at about 50 degrees Celsius for certain duration and then cooled them in order to destroy the micro-organisms.From his observation, Pasteur was aware(p) that if the microbes could affect liquids, then it was a first step that they could also affect animals and humans.1865 Pasteur begins his studies again after his asked by the silk industry to find the cause of the disease that had been affecting the silk worms.From his research he found that this morbific disease was caused by maintenance organisms, in this case parasites, bacteria and fungi. manduction findings stage1867 After Pasteurs influence, Joseph Lister a Surgeon decides to use this theory in medical procedures.Joseph begins to use phenol (Carbolic acid) solution to treat operative wounds, reducing infections and deaths.Repeat by others stage1876 Robert Koch, a German doc was one of the people who established that bacteria actually cause diseases. establish on Pasteurs previous studies, Koch was the first to discover the cause of anthrax (a disease that was destroying cattle and sheep in Europe). Wi th his research, Koch found a rod-shaped bacterium today enduren as (Bacillus anthrax) in a dead cows blood.Koch experimented by growing a culture of the bacteria from the dead cow and injecting samples into hale animals. When these animals became sick and subsequently died, Koch separated the bacteria from the blood of these cows and compared them with the fender set of bacteria samples enlistn from the blood of first cow. He cogitate that both samples of blood had the same bacteria.This occurrence proved that Pasteurs previous force field on microbes the cause of most animal deaths meant that these infections where motivated by micro-organisms.Theory acceptance stage1888 The Pasteur institute was founded in Paris for the treatment of diseases and Pasteur became the director. chore 2 M1Scientific questioning.Questions science is currently addressing.Is at that place a contract to for AIDS? world-wide heat, can it be stopped?Issue offshoot of all, global warming has not been proven it is as much a theory as is the theory of evolution and neither has been established as incontrovertible position.The causes for global warming are m either and varied the a la mode(p) proponent is that at that place are too many of us already on the planet and the numbers are increasing rapidly. The mere occurrence that we are continuously public discussion out carbon dioxide means that carbonic acid gas levels can save increase which allow for further increase the warming effect.Science is organism used in many ways to bring about the aims of Agenda 21, which was divulged at the UN Conference on Environment and festering held in Brazil on June 14, 1992. The main purpose of Agenda 21 is to control the world and compress our state by 80-90%, which would bring the population down to around 500 Million. Vaccines have been developed and are being used covertly to render populations of developing countries infertile and therefore reduce the size of future generatio ns.Questions science cannot answer yet.Where did humanity come from?Is there bread and butter on other planets?IssueAt the moment, from the scientists locate of downstairsstand there is no technology avail satisfactory at gift to inquire this point which makes the whole question very difficult to answer.Firstly, there is no way of knowing what forms of manners could exist on the planets outside of our solar system. Moreover, the universe is simply too vast and present technology cannot give space ships with the ability to touch off fast enough to explore these farthest off regions. Water has been found on the moon in high quantities than ever thought possible, and as Mars (which is thought most seeming planet to restrain several(prenominal) form of emotional state) has conditions close to what is found in Antarctica (other than the absence of oxygen).It is quite likely that Science volition be able to answer this question definitively in spite of appearance the next 10 to 20 days or so.Questions science may never answer.Can time travel be possible?When will the world end?IssueThe altogether way a definitive answer can be substantiated is if time travel was possible and that information could be relayed back to the present time. This in itself is a paradox. However, in order for science to answer the question, other questions choose to be presented.There is a raft of media attention focusing on the fact that the last date on the Mayan calendar is December twenty-first 2012. As most of the predictions relating to let on events in history have been successfully predicted, then it is quite reasonable to hypothesise that by using the Mayan calendar, some catastrophic event could well happen on or immediately after the 21st of December 2012.Philosophical proponents of the last days have diametrical opinions as to when this event will take place. For instance, Christianity teaches that the world will end will end once Jesus has returned to stat e and taken his true followers to heaven. It is written that Jesus himself does not know the date, as it is God the Father alone who knows.Ultimately, it is a known and proven fact that the earth will eventually burn up in a billion or so years time, when the sun has expanded into a giant red ball of fire. However a date within a million years either way cannot be substantiated.Reasons wherefore these questions are assortedIs there feel on other planets?Global warming, can it be stopped?When will the world end? to each one of these questions are different, because in order for them to be answered there needs to be an evolutionary step ladder of scientific knowledge. In other words, the level of scientific knowledge we have at present can only provide answers to a limited number of questions.However once our present level of scientific knowledge evolves to yet a higher level, todays mysteries will be disclosed with ease.Argument For and AgainstThe Theory of Evolution.D1We should a ll be aware that evolution is just a theory and as such this fitting addresses arguments both for and against the Theory of Evolution.What is evolution all about? We are ab initio taught in schools, universities and by the media that all existence evolved from a dewy-eyed life form over millions of years that the more intricate species on earth were compelled by natural selection, thus encouraging all present life on earth to have arrived at its present state as a result of what is termed as survival of the fittest. This is what most people take for granted as to what the term Evolution represents.However, there are new(a) aspects to the term Evolution, One arguecase in microbiology, is where bacteria has become repellent to antibiotics these bacteria are said to have evolved into an antibiotic strain.For the purpose of this argument, I will deal with the former, where the term Evolution assumes that all present life has evolved from primordial forms of life.Evidence has been presented to financial backing this theory most coming from fogey records.According to some records, the fossils examined as evidence reveal that living organisms such as the horse has modified over time. If we look at an example of a transitional form of record, we find that the horse has developed from a tiny animal with multi-toed feet existing within a tropical rainforest type environment, into a single-toed animal that is accustomed to a totally different environment.Additionally, evolutionists have proposed ideas that suggest that whales developed from early mammals such as camels, elephants and cows. Fossils of different animals were found to have similar characteristics as early whales. In their examine this was the evidence to show different transitions.In contrast, there is also brawny evidence that overrules the theory of evolution. If we take a close look at the whales formation, we start to question how is it possible that what was once a camel, adapted to breathing air and land based have the mental ability to know how to hold its breath in order to put its head under water? And how many generations of camels would have to have been born for this ability to become an inherent characteristic of its nature?Camels are herbivores, so at what point in their supposed evolutionary process were they able to begin to endure a wide range of food such as microscopic plankton and very large animals?Likewise, although evolutionists have argued that birds have developed from reptiles such as crocodiles there hasnt been any evidence to support this. Reptiles do not respire in the same manner as birds, so how could a birds lung authority possibly change from another type of lung function? To further support this argument of birds evolving from reptiles, there are no fossil records showing reptiles with feathers, birds with scales or anything in-between.Also, creationists argue that there is nothing in the fossil records which definitively proves that ther e is a relationship between humans and apes or even between any other living systems. This view is supported by the bible in Genesis chapter 124-25, which statesAnd God said, Let the earth be change with animals, each producing more of its kind. Let there be tame animals and teeny-weeny crawling animals and wild animals, let each produce more of its kind. And it happened. verse line 25 So God made the wild animals, the tame animals and all the small crawling animals to produce more of their kind. God saw that it was good.The key we learn from this quote is that every kind of living thing was talk into existence at the same time, hence the word Kind. This includes all life forms that have become extinct since that time and are now to be found in the fossil records.To further support this when we look at the different types of animals of the same kind dogs, whales, lizards and butterflies in the world, the theory that one simple life form evolved into many different types of life fo rms, becomes negated.ConclusionTo conclude, sounding at the arguments above it is quite fair to say that evolution is settle down a theory and not proven as fact there is as much evidence, if not more, to disprove it as a theory. despite the fact that evolutionists have found evidence in fossil records to support transitional forms, there is still no obvious evidence of fossils which show cultivation between crucial life-forms such as humans and the apes.It is sack when looking at the likeness in the anatomy of all living systems that they indicate exceptional evidence for Intelligent Design rather than the development of living things from a simple life form.Bibliography(Scientific theories)EncyclopaediaWikipediaDiscovery passageYouTubeBooks An introduction to microbiology (first edition)